Edmund Bohun and Jus Gentium in the Revolution Debate, 1689–1693
- 1 June 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Historical Journal
- Vol. 20 (3) , 569-586
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00011250
Abstract
The events of the Revolution of 1688 were the subject of an explosive pamphlet debate in which conservatives and radicals sought to capture the ideological initiative by imposing their rival interpretations upon events. The tories, who in large part brought about the Revolution, attempted to account for the nation's acceptance of the setdement in terms which could be accommodated within the traditional tory principles of non-resistance, hereditary right and monarchical prerogative. Recent scholarship has emphasized the extent to which the settlement was a compromise between conflicting whig and tory attitudes to monarchy, and within die context of this revision of the ‘whig’ interpretation a number of the arguments deployed by tories in 1689 and in subsequent years have now been elucidated.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- LetterNursing Standard, 2005
- History and ideology in the English revolutionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2002
- Charles Blount (1654-93), Deism, and English Free ThoughtJournal of the History of Ideas, 1974
- An Unpublished MS of Leibniz on the Allegiance Due to Sovereign PowersJournal of the History of Philosophy, 1973
- Monarchy and RevolutionPublished by Springer Nature ,1972
- Godly RulePublished by Springer Nature ,1969
- The Revolution and the ConstitutionPublished by Springer Nature ,1969
- William III and the Respectable RevolutionPublished by Harvard University Press ,1954
- Religion, Politics, and Oaths in the Glorious RevolutionThe Review of Politics, 1948
- Grotius, de Jure Belli ac Pacis: A Bibliographical AccountsAmerican Journal of International Law, 1925