Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure
Open Access
- 23 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 26 (11) , 1094-1100
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi146
Abstract
Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for refractory congestive heart failure (CHF). However, up to 30% of patients do not respond to CRT. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of a positive response to CRT. Methods and results This retrospective study included 139 consecutive patients successfully implanted with a CRT device (mean age, 68±9 years, 113 men). At baseline, 69% of patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III, and 31% in class IV, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 21±6%, and mean QRS duration was 188±28 ms. In each patient, left and right ventricular leads were placed to attain the shortest QRS duration during biventricular stimulation. Patients were classified at 6 months as responders to CRT (n=100) if they were alive, they had not been re-hospitalized for management of CHF, and the NYHA class had decreased by 1 point, and/or peak VO2 or 6 min hall-walk increased by >10%. All others were classified as non-responders (n=38; one patient was lost to follow-up). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to detect a pre- or intra-operative predictor of a positive response to CRT. Among multiple demographic, clinical, and ECG variables, the amount of QRS shortening (ΔQRS) associated with biventricular stimulation was the only independent predictor of a positive (37±23 ms) vs. negative (11±23 ms) response to CRT (PConclusion A positive response to CRT was observed in 73% of patients at 6 months and predicted only by ΔQRS.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delayJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Six year experience of transvenous left ventricular lead implantation for permanent biventricular pacing in patients with advanced heart failure: technical aspectsHeart, 2001
- Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failureEuropean Heart Journal, 2001
- Proposal for a new clinical end point to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and devices in the treatment of chronic heart failureJournal of Cardiac Failure, 2001
- Effects of Multisite Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction DelayNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Multisite stimulation for correction of cardiac asynchronyHeart, 2000
- Permanent Left Ventricular Pacing With Transvenous Leads Inserted Into The Coronary VeinsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1998