Breast MR Imaging: Computer-aided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions
- 1 July 2007
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 244 (1) , 94-103
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2441060634
Abstract
To retrospectively determine the sensitivity of kinetic features measured with computer-aided evaluation at breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in discriminating benign from malignant lesions, with histopathologic findings used as the reference standard. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Informed consent was waived. Suspicious breast lesions visible only at MR imaging and in which biopsy had been performed with MR imaging guidance were retrospectively evaluated with a computer-aided evaluation program. Computer-generated kinetic features for each lesion were recorded, and those of benign and malignant lesions were compared. Features analyzed included the presence or absence of computer-aided evaluation "threshold enhancement" at 50% and 100% minimum thresholds; degree of initial peak enhancement; and enhancement profiles composed of lesion percentages of washout, plateau, and persistent enhancement. The Fisher exact test and Student t test were used to assess differences in these analyses. One hundred fifty-four consecutive lesions (41 malignant, 113 benign) in 125 women (age range, 27-86 years; mean age, 52 years) were evaluated. The presence of threshold enhancement at computer-aided evaluation was sensitive for malignancy, with 38 of 41 (93%) malignant lesions demonstrating enhancement at both the 50% and 100% thresholds. Absence of threshold enhancement at computer-aided evaluation helped improve the discrimination between benign and malignant lesions when compared with that at initial interpretation by the radiologists. False-positive rates were reduced by 8.8% at the 50% enhancement threshold (not significant) and by 23.0% at the 100% enhancement threshold (P=.02) when compared with that at initial interpretation. Analyses of initial peak enhancement values and enhancement profiles did not demonstrate further improvements in lesion discrimination. The use of computer-aided evaluation for breast MR imaging significantly helped improve the discrimination of benign from malignant lesions when compared with that at initial interpretations by radiologists.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: Results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trialJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2005
- Sensitivity of MRI Versus Mammography for Detecting Foci of Multifocal, Multicentric Breast Cancer in Fatty and Dense Breasts Using the Whole-Breast Pathologic Examination as a Gold StandardAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Mammography, and Clinical Breast ExaminationJAMA, 2004
- Efficacy of MRI and Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening in Women with a Familial or Genetic PredispositionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- MR Imaging Screening of the Contralateral Breast in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Preliminary ResultsRadiology, 2003
- Screening for breast cancer with MRISeminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, 2003
- MR Imaging Findings in the Contralateral Breast of Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast CancerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Breast Carcinoma: Effect of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the Therapeutic ApproachRadiology, 1999
- Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancerEuropean Radiology, 1997
- MR imaging of the breastJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1993