Comparison between polyclonal and first and second generation monoclonal radioimmunoassays in the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Open Access
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 6 (4) , 636-639
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840060414
Abstract
Serum from 221 black patients with hepatocellular carcinoma was tested for HBsAg using a polyclonal radioimmunoassay, and first and second generation monoclonal radioimmunoassays designated M1-RIA and M2-RIA. These monoclonal radioimmunoassays have a lower limit of detection of about 55 and 15 pg of HBsAg-associated epitopes per ml of serum. Correlations were made with other hepatitis B virus serologic markers such as anti-HBc and anti-HBs, using polyclonal radioimmunoassays. We found 47.5% (105/221) of the patients were HBsAg positive by conventional polyclonal radioimmunoassay; all of these patients were also reactive by monoclonal radioimmunoassay. Of the 116 polyclonal radioimmunoassay-negative patients, 4 (3.4%) were reactive by M1-RIA. These four patients were all positive for anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs antibodies. There were 106 of 112 patients negative for HBsAg by polyclonal radioimmunoassay and M1-RIA available for testing by the M2-RIA; 11 (10.4%) were found to be positive only by this test. Thus, with the use of M1- and M2-RIAs, the number of hepatocellular carcinoma patients negative for HBsAg by polyclonal radioimmunoassay was reduced by 14% in this population. More importantly, of the 11 M2-RIA-positive patients, six demonstrated anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs antibodies whereas the remaining five had no serologic evidence of recent or past hepatitis B virus exposure. Finally, of the 21 patients in this series with no markers of hepatitis B virus infection using polyclonal radioimmunoassay and M1-RIA, five (24%) were reactive for HBsAg-associated epitopes by M2-RIA. Taken together, these findings may be due in part to the detection of HBsAg in immune complexes, particularly in those patients with anti-HBc and anti-HBs. However, in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with no hepatitis B virus serologic markers, the M2-RIA may have been reactive due to low levels of antigen expression co-existing with an inadequate or lack of a host immune response to HBcAg and HBsAg, variable expression of hepatitis B virus gene products or to a “hepatitis B-related virus”.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Structural analysis of hepatitis B surface antigen by monoclonal antibodies.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1985
- Hepatitis B Virus DNA in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease and Negative Tests for Hepatitis B Surface AntigenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Improved detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in blood donors by monoclonal radioimmunoassayTransfusion, 1985
- Clinical Significance of Enhanced Detection of HBsAg by a Monoclonal Radioimmunoassay†Hepatology, 1984
- Hepatitis B viral antigenic structure: signature analysis by monoclonal radioimmunoassays.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1984
- Prognosis of Primary Hepatocellular CarcinomaHepatology, 1984
- Monoclonal radioimmunoassays for hepatitis B surface antigen: demonstration of hepatitis B virus DNA or related sequences in serum and viral epitopes in immune complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1982
- Immunodiagnosis of hepatitis B with high-affinity IgM monoclonal antibodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1981
- The labelling of proteins to high specific radioactivities by conjugation to a 125I-containing acylating agent. Application to the radioimmunoassayBiochemical Journal, 1973