Predicting Protein Complex Membership Using Probabilistic Network Reliability
Open Access
- 12 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genome Research
- Vol. 14 (6) , 1170-1175
- https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2203804
Abstract
Evidence for specific protein–protein interactions is increasingly available from both small- and large-scale studies, and can be viewed as a network. It has previously been noted that errors are frequent among large-scale studies, and that error frequency depends on the large-scale method used. Despite knowledge of the error-prone nature of interaction evidence, edges (connections) in this network are typically viewed as either present or absent. However, use of a probabilistic network that considers quantity and quality of supporting evidence should improve inference derived from protein networks. Here we demonstrate inference of membership in a partially known protein complex by using a probabilistic network model and an algorithm previously used to evaluate reliability in communication networks.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network DatabaseNucleic Acids Research, 2003
- Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sourcesNature Biotechnology, 2002
- Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactionsNature, 2002
- Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometryNature, 2002
- Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexesNature, 2002
- Is There a Bias in Proteome Research?Genome Research, 2001
- Saccharomyces cerevisiaeCTF18 and CTF4 Are Required for Sister Chromatid CohesionMolecular and Cellular Biology, 2001
- A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactomeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- NOT1(CDC39), NOT2(CDC36), NOT3, and NOT4 encode a global-negative regulator of transcription that differentially affects TATA-element utilization.Genes & Development, 1994