Can Managed Care And Competition Control Medicare Costs?
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 22 (Suppl1) , W3-176
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.w3.176
Abstract
Medicare+Choice (M+C) was conceived to bring managed care and competitive forces to bear on Medicare. Ultimately, M+C could not thrive under the conditions of the marketplace and the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Here I review what went wrong and the lessons from the experience, concluding that M+C is a tool, not a strategy. While managed care in a multiple-choice environment may have the potential to generate limited savings, promoting managed care and competition alone will not preempt the need for a debate on Medicare's obligations and how to finance them.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Job-based health insurance in 2001: inflation hits double digits, managed care retreats.Health Affairs, 2001
- Medicare+Choice: An Interim Report CardHealth Affairs, 2001
- What Drives Medicare Managed Care Growth?Health Affairs, 1999
- ISO Quick Fix, Free Lunch, and Share of PieJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1999
- Reexamining The Delivery System As Part Of Medicare ReformHealth Affairs, 1999
- Health Care For The Elderly: How Much? Who Will Pay For It?Health Affairs, 1999
- Media Coverage Of Managed Care: Is There A Negative Bias?Health Affairs, 1998