The Adjudication of Criminal Responsibility: A Review of Theory and Research
- 1 January 1992
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- How jurors construe "insanity."Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful insanity pleas.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Comparing females acquitted by reason of insanity, convicted, and civilly committed in Florida: 1977–1984.Law and Human Behavior, 1988
- Implicit theories of criminal responsibility: Decision making and the insanity defense.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- AN ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD THE INSANITY DEFENSE*Criminology, 1986
- When courts and experts disagree: Discordance between insanity recommendations and adjudications.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- The feasibility of a brief evaluation of mental state at the time of the offense.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Evaluating insanity: A study of construct validity.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- The death-qualified jury and the defense of insanity.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Insanity plea: Interexaminer agreement and concordance of psychiatric opinion and court verdict.Law and Human Behavior, 1981