Randomization and concealment in surgical trials: a comparison between orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic randomized trials
- 23 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
- Vol. 125 (1) , 70-72
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0762-6
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2002
- Understanding controlled trials: Randomisation methods in controlled trialsBMJ, 1998
- The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1998
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelinesThe Lancet, 1996
- Subverting Randomization in Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1995
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995