Long-term outcome after an early invasive versus selective invasive treatment strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and elevated cardiac troponin T (the ICTUS trial): a follow-up study

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:

• Benefit of Early Invasive Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
• 5-year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study
  The Lancet, 2006
• Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstable angina & non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era
  Published by Wiley ,2006
• Early Invasive versus Selectively Invasive Management for Acute Coronary Syndromes
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
• 5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial
  The Lancet, 2005
• FRISC score for selection of patients for an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable coronary artery disease
  Heart, 2005
• Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
  JAMA, 2005
• A long-term perspective on the protective effects of an early invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
• Effects of Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes without ST-Segment Elevation
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
• Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000