Brachial Artery Cross-Sectional Area and Distensibility Before and After Arteriolar Vasodilatation in Men with Sustained Essential Hypertension
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
- Vol. 9 (6) , 734-742
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-198706000-00015
Abstract
Blood pressure, volume distensibility (VD), and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the brachial artery were studied using pulsed Doppler systems in 51 patients with sustained essential hypertension in comparison with 21 normotensive controls of the same age. In hypertensive patients, in baseline conditions, CSA was significantly increased and VD decreased.sbd.the two parameters strongly and negatively correlated independent of the blood pressure level. Arteriolar vasodilatation was produced by three pharmacological agents.sbd.cadralazine, a dihydralazine-like compound; nicorandil, a nicotinamide derivative; and nitrendipine, a calcium entry blocker. For the same blood pressure reduction, cadralazine significantly reduced CSA, while nucorandil and nitrendipine increased it. Nitrendipine significantly increased VD, which was not modified by cadralazine and nicorandil. For cadralazine and nicorandil, a significant negative correlation was obsreved between VD and CSA. The relationship was the same as in baseline conditions. With nitrendipine, no significant correlation was observed between the two parameters. At any given CSA, distensibility was higher with nitrendipine than with cadralazine or nicorandil. The study provided evidence that, in men with essential hypertension, (a) in basal conditions, the negative relationship between VD and CSA reflected intrinsic alterations of the arterial wall, (b) while cadralazine, nicorandil, and nitrendipine caused a similar degree of arteriolar dilatation, nicorandil and nitrendipine caused active arterial dilatation as well, and (c) changes in distensibility after drug administration were not directly related to blood pressure level and were mediated either by predominant geometrical modifications (cadralazine, nicorandil) or by the predominant relaxing effect of the drug on arterial smooth muscle tone (nitrendipine), or both.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of oral MK 421 and propranolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension and their effects on arterial and venous vessels of the forearmThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Estimation of forearm arterial compliance in normal and hypertensive men from simultaneous pressure and flow measurements in the brachial artery, using a pulsed Doppler device and a first-order arterial model during diastoleCardiovascular Research, 1983
- Cadralazine (ISF 2469): Dose-related antihypertensive activity after single oral administration to patientsEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1983
- Pulsed Doppler: determination of diameter, blood flow velocity, and volumic flow of brachial artery in manCardiovascular Research, 1981
- Pulsed Doppler: diameter, blood flow velocity and volumic flow of the brachial artery in sustained essential hypertension.Circulation, 1981
- Clinical evaluation of Dinamap 845 automated blood pressure recorder.Heart, 1980
- An evaluation of large arteries compliance in manAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 1979
- STUDIES ON THE ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF HUMAN ISOLATED AORTAJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1937