Paper people versus direct observation: An empirical examination of laboratory methodologies
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Vol. 12 (5) , 387-397
- https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030120504
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of purpose of observation on accuracy of immediate and delayed performance ratingsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1989
- A further examination of student babies and laboratory bath water: A response to Slade and GordonJournal of Organizational Behavior, 1988
- A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath waterJournal of Organizational Behavior, 1988
- A reexamination of the relation between halo error and accuracy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988
- The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- Presentation mode, task importance, and cue order in experimental research on expert judges.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- Limits in Generalization from Psychological Research to Performance Appraisal ProcessesAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- Accuracy in behavioral measurement: An alternative definition based on raters' cognitive schema and signal detection theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- Some Neglected Variables in Research on Discrimination in AppraisalsAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: A process approach to the study of halo in performance ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983