Efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants in depression treated in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis
- 10 May 2003
- Vol. 326 (7397) , 1014
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7397.1014
Abstract
What is already known on this topic What is already known on this topic Previous meta-analyses have included comparatively large numbers of secondary care based studies that indicate no significant differences in efficacy between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics Previous meta-analyses are conflicting regarding the relative tolerability between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics, but do suggest a small but significant difference in favour of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors Such meta-analyses show notable heterogeneity What this study adds What this study adds Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are better tolerated than tricyclics by primary care patients and may be better tolerated by primary care patients than secondary care patients Study setting seems to be important and should be considered before licences are given to specific antidepressants Although there are limited high quality data, available evidence shows that the most commonly prescribed classes of antidepressants in primary care (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics) are equally effective in the short term for primary care patients, but the literature has many gaps What is already known on this topic What is already known on this topic Previous meta-analyses have included comparatively large numbers of secondary care based studies that indicate no significant differences in efficacy between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics Previous meta-analyses are conflicting regarding the relative tolerability between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics, but do suggest a small but significant difference in favour of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors Such meta-analyses show notable heterogeneity What this study adds What this study adds Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are better tolerated than tricyclics by primary care patients and may be better tolerated by primary care patients than secondary care patients Study setting seems to be important and should be considered before licences are given to specific antidepressants Although there are limited high quality data, available evidence shows that the most commonly prescribed classes of antidepressants in primary care (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics) are equally effective in the short term for primary care patients, but the literature has many gapsKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology of depression in primary carePublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Meta-analysis of effects and side effects of low dosage tricyclic antidepressants in depression: systematic reviewBMJ, 2002
- A Systematic Review of Newer Pharmacotherapies for Depression in Adults: Evidence Report Summary: Clinical Guideline, Part 2Annals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Outcome of anxiety and depressive disorders in primary careThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1997
- Prescribing antidepressants in general practice. Systematic review of all pertinent trials is required to establish guidelines.1997
- Symptom profiles of depression among general medical service users compared with speciality mental health service usersPsychological Medicine, 1997
- Are SSRIs better than TCAs? Comparison of SSRIs and TCAs: A meta-analysisDepression and Anxiety, 1997
- Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysisBMJ, 1995
- Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in primary care.1995
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.BMJ, 1993