Classification of the Extended Middle Cranial Fossa Approach
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Vol. 111 (sup487) , 6-16
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489109130439
Abstract
There are several possible operative approaches to acoustic neuroma surgery. Ideally, there should be no need to select among approaches according to tumor size or indications for hearing preservation. The ideal approach should also allow otologists and neurosurgeons to work as a team using the same operative field and achieve functional preservation (facial nerve function and hearing) in a high percentage of cases. In 1977, the authors first reported on the extended middle cranial fossa (EMCF) approach for AN surgery. Based on our 15-year experiences of this approach, we have classified it into 3 types and describe their indications and techniques in the present paper. In addition, we examine the advantages and disadvantages and emphasize its excellent applicability as a team approach for otologists and neurosurgeons.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facial Nerve Function after Surgery for Removal of Acoustic Neuroma by the Extended Middle Cranial Fossa ApproachORL, 1986
- Chirurgie des Acusticus NeurinomsEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 1980
- A modified extended middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic tumorsEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 1977
- An Extended Approach Through The Middle Cranial Fossa To The Internal Auditory Meatus And The Cerebello-Pontine AngleActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1975
- Experiences with a translabyrinthine-transtentorial approach to the cerebellopontine angleJournal of Neurosurgery, 1973