Willingness to communicate: Antecedents & consequences
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 47 (2) , 215-229
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370135
Abstract
Willingness to communicate (WTC) is examined at the trait and state levels, which are viewed as complementary. Measures of trait WTC, extraversion, emotional stability, self‐esteem, communication apprehension, and competence were administered to 226 male and female university students. A structural equation model examined the hypothesized antecedents to WTC and revealed a good fit to the data. Seventy of the participants also volunteered for a communication laboratory. Trait WTC was related to volunteering for the lab portion of the study and state WTC was related to initiating a difficult communication task. Also, state perceived competence predicted both time and number of ideas on an easy speaking task; state anxiety predicted time and number of ideas on a difficult speaking task.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysisCommunication Research Reports, 1994
- The structure of phenotypic personality traits.American Psychologist, 1993
- The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.Psychological Assessment, 1992
- Language Anxiety: Its Relationship to Other Anxieties and to Processing in Native and Second Languages*Language Learning, 1991
- Situational and Predispositional correlates of public speaking anxietyCommunication Education, 1988
- Personality and Individual DifferencesPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Anxiety, learning, and memory: A reconceptualizationJournal of Research in Personality, 1979
- The unwillingness‐to‐communicate scale: Development and validationCommunication Monographs, 1976
- Persuasiveness and Persuasibility as Related to Intelligence and Extraversion*British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1965
- Personality characteristics related to leadership behavior in two types of small group situational problems.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1958