Questioning the Consensus: Managing Carrier Status Results Generated by Newborn Screening
- 1 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 99 (2) , 210-215
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2008.136614
Abstract
An apparent consensus governs the management of carrier status information generated incidentally through newborn screening: results cannot be withheld from parents. This normative stance encodes the focus on autonomy and distaste for paternalism that characterize the principles of clinical bioethics. However, newborn screening is a classic public health intervention in which paternalism may trump autonomy and through which parents are-in effect-required to receive carrier information. In truth, the disposition of carrier results generates competing moral infringements: to withhold information or require its possession. Resolving this dilemma demands consideration of a distinctive body of public health ethics to highlight the moral imperatives associated with the exercise of collective authority in the pursuit of public health benefits.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carrier testing in minors: conflicting viewsNature Reviews Genetics, 2007
- Carrier testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papersEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2005
- Research for Newborn Screening: Developing a National FrameworkPediatrics, 2005
- Implementation of Informed Consent for a Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Program in France: Low Refusal Rates for Optional TestingThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2005
- Implications of carrier identification in newborn screening for cystic fibrosisArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2003
- CHALLENGING MEDICAL-LEGAL NORMS: THE ROLE OF AUTONOMY, CONFIDENTIALITY, AND PRIVACY IN PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILIAL GROUP RIGHTS IN GENETIC INFORMATIONJournal of Legal Medicine, 2001
- Genetic Ignorance, Moral Obligations and Social DutiesJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2000
- Autonomy, Respect, and Genetic Information Policy: A Reply to Tuija Takala and Matti HäyryJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2000
- Effects of genetic screening on perceptions of health: a pilot study.Journal of Medical Genetics, 1992
- Neonatal screening for sickle cell diseases in Camberwell: results and recommendations of a two year pilot study.BMJ, 1986