What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials.
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Vol. 92 (2) , 200-8
Abstract
Much consumer health information addresses issues of disease risk or treatment risks and benefits, addressing questions such as "How effective is this treatment?" or "What is the likelihood that this test will give a false positive result?" Insofar as it addresses outcome likelihood, this information is essentially quantitative in nature, which is of critical importance, because quantitative information tends to be difficult to understand and therefore inaccessible to consumers. Information professionals typically examine reading level to determine the accessibility of consumer health information, but this measure does not adequately reflect the difficulty of quantitative information, including materials addressing issues of risk and benefit. As a result, different methods must be used to evaluate this type of consumer health material. There are no standard guidelines or assessment tools for this task, but research in cognitive psychology provides insight into the best ways to present risk and benefit information to promote understanding and minimize interpretation bias. This paper offers an interdisciplinary bridge that brings these results to the attention of information professionals, who can then use them to evaluate consumer health materials addressing risks and benefits.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- How informed is consent? Understanding of pictorial and verbal probability information by medical inpatientsPostgraduate Medical Journal, 2002
- What Cognitive Science Tells Us about the Design of Reports for ConsumersMedical Care Research and Review, 2002
- Frequency or Probability? A Qualitative Study of Risk Communication Formats Used in Health CareMedical Decision Making, 2001
- General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated SamplesMedical Decision Making, 2001
- Adolescents’ and adults’ understanding of probability expressionsJournal of Adolescent Health, 2001
- A New Scale for Assessing Perceptions of ChanceMedical Decision Making, 2000
- Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk and Screening Effectiveness in Women Younger Than 50 Years of AgeJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995
- Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- How Medical Professionals Evaluate Expressions of ProbabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974