Educating African American Men about the Prostate Cancer Screening Dilemma: A Randomized Intervention
Open Access
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 15 (11) , 2179-2188
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0417
Abstract
Background: Until there is a definitive demonstration that early diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer reduces disease-related mortality, it is imperative to promote informed screening decisions by providing balanced information about the potential benefits and risks of prostate cancer screening. Within a community/academic collaboration, we conducted a randomized trial of a printed booklet and a videotape that were designed for African American (AA) men. The purpose of the trial was to determine the effect of the interventions on knowledge, decisional conflict, satisfaction with the screening decision, and self-reported screening. Methods: Participants were 238 AA men, ages 40 to 70 years, who were members of the Prince Hall Masons in Washington, DC. Men were randomly assigned to the (a) video-based information study arm, (b) print-based information study arm, or (c) wait list control study arm. Intervention materials were mailed to men at home. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1 month, and 12 months postintervention. Multivariate analyses, including ANCOVA and logistic regression, were used to analyze group differences. Results: The booklet and video resulted in a significant improvement in knowledge and a reduction in decisional conflict about prostate cancer screening, relative to the wait list control. Satisfaction with the screening decision was not affected by the interventions. Self-reported screening rates increased between the baseline and the 1-year assessment, although screening was not differentially associated with either of the interventions. In exploratory analyses, prostate-specific antigen testing at 1 year was more likely among previously screened men and was associated with having low baseline decisional conflict. Conclusions: This study represents one of the first randomized intervention trials specifically designed to address AA men's informed decision making about prostate cancer screening. We have developed and evaluated culturally sensitive, balanced, and disseminable materials that improved knowledge and reduced decisional conflict about prostate cancer screening among AA men. Due to the high incidence and mortality rates among AA men, there is a need for targeted educational materials, particularly materials that are balanced in terms of the benefits and risks of screening. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(11):2179–88)Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2006CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2006
- Patient Education for Informed Decision Making About Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-UpAnnals of Family Medicine, 2003
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Self-Reported Reasons Men Decide Not to Participate in Free Prostate Cancer ScreeningOncology Nursing Forum, 2003
- Impact of undergoing prostate carcinoma screening on prostate carcinoma-related knowledge and distressCancer, 2002
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer ScreeningArchives of Family Medicine, 1999
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Roles of Science, Policy, and Opinion in Determining What is Best for PatientsAnnual Review of Medicine, 1999
- Controversies in prostate cancer screening. Analogies to the early lung cancer screening debatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screeningArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- TRENDS IN MORTALITY FROM CERVICAL CANCER IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES: ASSOCIATION WITH ORGANISED SCREENING PROGRAMMESThe Lancet, 1987