A Comparative Study of Standard-Setting Methods
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Measurement in Education
- Vol. 2 (2) , 121-141
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0202_3
Abstract
The borderline-group method and the contrasting-groups method were compared with Nedelsky's method at four schools, with Angoff's method at another four schools, and with each other at all eight sc...Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Consumer’s Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-Referenced TestsReview of Educational Research, 1986
- Some Thoughts on the Use of Decision Theory to Set Cutoff Scores: Comment on de Gruijter and HambletonApplied Psychological Measurement, 1984
- A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF ESTABLISHING CUT‐OFF SCORES ON CRITERION‐REFERENCED TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1983
- A LATENT TRAIT METHOD FOR DETERMINING INTRAJUDGE INCONSISTENCY IN THE ANGOFF AND NEDELSKY TECHNIQUES OF STANDARD SETTINGJournal of Educational Measurement, 1982
- Standard Setting Issues and MethodsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- A COMPARISON OF APPROACHES FOR SETTING PROFICIENCY STANDARDSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1980
- Absolute Grading Standards for Objective TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1954