Combined first-trimester versus second-trimester serum screening for Down syndrome: A cost analysis
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 188 (3) , 745-751
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.127
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies Commentary: Results may not be widely applicable Authors' responseBMJ, 2001
- Efficacy of screening for fetal down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- One stop clinic for assessment of risk for fetal anomalies: a report of the first year of prospective screening for chromosomal anomalies in the first trimesterBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- First-Trimester down syndrome screening using dried blood biochemistry and nuchal translucencyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis for down syndrome using the British or the American approachObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Fetal Down syndrome screening: A cost effectiveness analysis of alternative screening programsThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 1999
- Maternal age‐ and gestation‐specific risk for trisomy 21Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Economic evaluation of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in the U.S.A.Prenatal Diagnosis, 1998
- The imprecision in rates of down syndrome by 1‐year maternal age intervals: A critical analysis of rates used in biochemical screeningPrenatal Diagnosis, 1994
- Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome with Use of Maternal Serum MarkersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992