Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional cell counting: a practical perspective
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Neurosciences
- Vol. 24 (1) , 11-17
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01660-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and biasPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- What was wrong with the Abercrombie and empirical cell counting methods? A reviewThe Anatomical Record, 1998
- Quantification without pontification: Choosing a method for counting objects in sectioned tissuesJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1997
- Any way you cut it: A new journal policy for the use of unbiased counting methodsJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1996
- The total number of neurons in the human neocortex unbiasedly estimated using optical disectorsJournal of Microscopy, 1990
- Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned materialJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1988
- Stereology of arbitrary particles*Journal of Microscopy, 1986
- The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disectorJournal of Microscopy, 1984
- Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effectJournal of Microscopy, 1977
- Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sectionsThe Anatomical Record, 1946