Canonical correlation analysis and structural equation modeling: What do they have in common?
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Vol. 4 (1) , 65-79
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519709540060
Abstract
This article illustrates the relation between structural equation modeling (SEM) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). The representation of CCA in SEM may provide some important interpretive information that is not available from conventional CCA, that is, statistical tests for the canonical function and index coefficients, and statistical tests for individual canonical functions. Hierarchically, the relation between the two analytic approaches suggests that SEM stands to be a more general analytic approach. For researchers interested in these techniques, an understanding of the interrelation among them can be helpful to our choice of analytic method.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues.Psychological Bulletin, 1993
- Canonical Correlation Analysis As A Special Case Of A Structural Relations ModelMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1981
- Multivariate AnalysisEvaluation Review, 1981
- A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures: Some remarks on applicationsBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1980
- Linear Structural Equations with Latent VariablesPsychometrika, 1980
- Causal modeling applied to psychonomic systems simulationBehavior Research Methods, 1980
- A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structuresBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1978
- Canonical correlation analysis: A general parametric significance-testing system.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Structural Equation Methods in the Social SciencesEconometrica, 1972
- The most predictable criterion.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1935