Prognostic Role of Preoperative Nutritional and Immunological Assessment in the Surgical Patient
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
- Vol. 12 (2) , 138-142
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607188012002138
Abstract
The utilization of delayed hypersensitivity response (DHR) for the identification of high‐risk patients with regard to postoperative septic complications is still discussed. The aim of this study was to clarify how much DHR may improve the prognostic capacity of nutritional assessment (NA). Nutritional and immunological evaluations were performed at admission on 405 patients undergoing elective general surgical procedures. Subjects with serum albumin ≤3.0 g/ dl or total iron‐binding capacity ≤220 μg/dl or weight loss ≥10% with respect to usual body weight were classified as malnourished. DHR was assessed by performing skin tests with four recall antigens: PPD, candida, trichophyton, sk‐sd. The incidence of postoperative complications resulted higher among the 187 malnourished patients (31.0%) than in the 218 well‐nourished ones (14.2%) (p < 0.001), and among the 213 anergic patients (29.6%) than in the 192 normal responders (13.5%) (p < 0.001). To determine how much skin tests may improve the prognostic ability of NA, the relationship between DHR and postoperative complications was also studied in the malnourished and in the well‐nourished patients, separately. In the malnourished group, the patients with an impairment of DHR had a higher incidence of postoperative infections than normal responders (p < 0.05). In the well‐nourished group, no significant differences were found between anergic patients and normal responders. In our study, DHR slightly improved the prognostic capacity of NA. Therefore, the first approach to identify the high‐risk patients seems to be the unexpensive, quick, and available determination of nutritional status. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 12:138–142, 1988)This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Nutritional” Markers as Prognostic Indicators of Postoperative Sepsis in Cancer PatientsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1985
- The Value of Nutritional Assessment in the Surgical PatientJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1985
- Causes of anergy in the surgical patient and its relationship to postoperative sepsisClinical Nutrition, 1984
- Delayed Hypersensitivity Skin Testing Does Not Influence the Management of Surgical PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1982
- Delayed hypersensitivity testing for the prediction of postoperative complicationsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Nutritional AssessmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Nutritional Assessment and Surgical Infections in Patients with Gastric Cancer or Peptic UlcerJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1982
- Utility of Skin Testing in Nutritional Assessment: A Critical ReviewJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1982
- Evaluation of Possible Causes of Delayed Hypersensitivity Impairment in Cancer PatientsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1981
- NUTRITIONAL PROBLEMS OF SURGICAL PATIENTSAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1955