New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 154 (4) , 713-719
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107663
Abstract
Five types of film (Kodak OM, Kodak OM-SO177, Konica CM, Dupont Microvision, and Fuji MiMa) exposed in combination with seven different intensifying screens (Min R, Min R Medium, Siemens Orthox MA, Kyokka HR Mammo Fine, Agfa Gevaert Detail S (old and new), and Konica Monarch) were processed for either 90 sec (at 33.3 degrees C) or 3 min (at 35.0 degrees C). The films imaged a Computerized Imaging Reference System phantom with additional detail test objects placed on its surface to produce four groups of objects with which to evaluate resolution and contrast. For objects that tested resolution, the Kyokka HR Mammo Fine (Fuji) screen was statistically significantly superior; for objects that tested contrast, the Konica Monarch screen was statistically significantly superior. Extended processing did not affect Dupont and Kodak OM film as much as it affected the other films. It did affect contrast for the other films tested. The mean glandular doses from gridless exposures ranged from 32 to 80 mrad (0.32-0.80 mGy) over all film/screen/processing combinations for a 4.5-cm-thick test object. Several new film/screen combinations can provide images superior to the Kodak Min R/OM combination at a reduced radiation dose. The Kyokka HR Mammo Fine (Fuji) screen was found statistically superior in radiographic resolution of mammographic test objects and the Konica Monarch screen was found to be superior in defining contrast.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Films, screens and cassettes for mammographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1989
- Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noiseAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1989
- Film processing for mammographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1988
- Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.Radiology, 1987
- A comparative study of films and screens for mammographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1987
- Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systemsMedical Physics, 1985
- Simultaneous Statistical InferencePublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- Evaluation of Mammographic Screen-Film SystemsRadiology, 1978