The individualised birthweight ratio: a more logical outcome measure of pregnancy than birthweight alone
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 100 (4) , 342-347
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12977.x
Abstract
Objective To provide a new outcome measure for pregnancy specifically related to the individual. Design Computer analysis of physiological factors affecting birthweight. Setting Two provincial teaching hospitals (University and City Hospitals, Nottingham) and an associated district general hospital (Derby City Hospital) serving a defined catchment area in the East Midlands. Subjects All women delivering in the above hospitals since the start of computerised obstetric records: 31 561 women with gestational age verified by early pregnancy ultrasound scan data. Main Outcome Measures Calculation of the predicted birthweight taking into account maternal and fetal physiological factors. Derivation of the individualised birthweight ratio (actual birthweight divided by predicted birthweight expressed as a percentage) for each individual baby. Results The individualised birthweight ratio redefines as normally grown 41% of babies below the 10th centile of crude birthweight for gestation. Other babies previously regarded as normal are redefined as growth retarded. At the upper end of the distribution 46% of those above the 90th centile of birthweight for gestation are redefined as normally grown. Conclusions The predicted birthweight can be calculated for an individual pregnancy at a given gestation. The standardised comparison between this predicted birthweight and the actual birthweight is a more logical reflection of the normality of intrauterine growth and therefore more logical as an outcome measure for pregnancy than crude birthweight for gestation.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasound instead of last menstrual period as the basis of gestational age assignmentUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1991
- Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational ageBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Influence of elective preterm delivery on birthweight and head circumference standards.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1987
- Reliability of Ultrasound Fetometry in Estimating Gestational Age in the Second TrimesterActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986
- Birthweight between 14 and 42 weeks' gestation.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1985
- The significance of uncertain gestation for obstetric outcomeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Reviewing birthweight standardsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeksPublished by Elsevier ,1969
- THE ASSESSMENT OF FETAL GROWTHBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1968