Effect of training traditional birth attendants on neonatal mortality (Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project): randomised controlled study
Open Access
- 3 February 2011
- Vol. 342 (feb03 2) , d346
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d346
Abstract
Objective To determine whether training traditional birth attendants to manage several common perinatal conditions could reduce neonatal mortality in the setting of a resource poor country with limited access to healthcare.Design Prospective, cluster randomised and controlled effectiveness study.Setting Lufwanyama, an agrarian, poorly developed district located in the Copperbelt province, Zambia. All births carried out by study birth attendants occurred at mothers’ homes, in rural village settings.Participants 127 traditional birth attendants and mothers and their newborns (3559 infants delivered regardless of vital status) from Lufwanyama district.Interventions Using an unblinded design, birth attendants were cluster randomised to intervention or control groups. The intervention had two components: training in a modified version of the neonatal resuscitation protocol, and single dose amoxicillin coupled with facilitated referral of infants to a health centre. Control birth attendants continued their existing standard of care (basic obstetric skills and use of clean delivery kits).Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the proportion of liveborn infants who died by day 28 after birth, with rate ratios statistically adjusted for clustering. Secondary outcomes were mortality at different time points; and comparison of causes of death based on verbal autopsy data.Results Among 3497 deliveries with reliable information, mortality at day 28 after birth was 45% lower among liveborn infants delivered by intervention birth attendants than control birth attendants (rate ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.90). The greatest reductions in mortality were in the first 24 hours after birth: 7.8 deaths per 1000 live births for infants delivered by intervention birth attendants compared with 19.9 per 1000 for infants delivered by control birth attendants (0.40, 0.19 to 0.83). Deaths due to birth asphyxia were reduced by 63% among infants delivered by intervention birth attendants (0.37, 0.17 to 0.81) and by 81% within the first two days after birth (0.19, 0.07 to 0.52). Stillbirths and deaths from serious infection occurred at similar rates in both groups.Conclusions Training traditional birth attendants to manage common perinatal conditions significantly reduced neonatal mortality in a rural African setting. This approach has high potential to be applied to similar settings with dispersed rural populations.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00518856.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sub-Saharan Africa's Mothers, Newborns, and Children: Where and Why Do They Die?PLoS Medicine, 2010
- Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysisThe Lancet, 2010
- Effect of scaling up women's groups on birth outcomes in three rural districts in Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2010
- Newborn-Care Training and Perinatal Mortality in Developing CountriesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Neonatal resuscitation in low-resource settings: What, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up?International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2009
- 60 million non-facility births: Who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths?International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2009
- Educational Impact of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program in Low-Risk Delivery Centers in a Developing CountryPublished by Elsevier ,2008
- Traditional birth attendant training for improving health behaviours and pregnancy outcomesPublished by Wiley ,2007
- Newborn resuscitation: defining best practice for low-income settingsTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2006
- Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004