Relationship Between Catheter Forces, Lesion Characteristics, “Popping,” and Char Formation: Experience with Robotic Navigation System
- 23 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 20 (4) , 436-440
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01355.x
Abstract
Introduction: Popping, char and perforation are complications that can occur following catheter ablation. We measured the amount of grams (g) applied to the endocardium during ablation using a sensor incorporated in the long sheath of a robotic system. We evaluated the relationship between lesion formation, pressure, and the development of complications. Methods: Using a robotic navigation system, lesions were placed in the left atrium (LA) at six settings, using a constant duration (40 seconds) and flow rate of either 17 cc/min or 30 cc/min with an open irrigated catheter (OIC). Evidence of complications was noted and lesion location recorded for later analysis at necropsy. Results: Lesions using 30 Watts (W) were more likely to be transmural at higher (>40 g) than lower (40 g of pressure demonstrated “popping” and crater formation as compared with lesions with 20–30 g of pressure (41% vs 15%, P = 0.008). A majority of lesions placed using higher power (45 W) with higher pressures (>40 g) were associated with char and crater formation (66.7%). No lesions using 10 g of pressure were transmural, regardless of the power. Lesions placed with a power setting less than 35 W were more likely to result in “relative” sparing of the endocardial surface than lesions at a power setting higher than 35 W (62% vs 33.3%, P = 0.02) regardless of the pressure. Conclusions: When using an OIC, lower power settings (≤35 W) and lower/medium contact pressure were more likely to show a “relative” spared endocardial surface. Overall, contact pressure between 20 g and 30 g and a power setting of 40 W appeared to achieve transmurality by preserving safety.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Systematical Analysis of In Vivo Contact Forces on Virtual Catheter Tip/Tissue Surface Contact during Cardiac Mapping and InterventionJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2008
- Electrophysiologic and Anatomic Characterization of Sites Resistant to Electrical Isolation During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective StudyJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2007
- Time to Electrode Rewarming After Cryoablation Predicts Lesion SizeJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2007
- View-Synchronized Robotic Image-Guided Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation AblationCirculation, 2007
- Remote Magnetic Navigation to Guide Endocardial and Epicardial Catheter Mapping of Scar-Related Ventricular TachycardiaCirculation, 2007
- RF Catheter Ablation: Lessons on LesionsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2006
- Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control System: Feasibility and Safety of Transseptal Puncture and Endocardial Catheter NavigationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2006
- Robotic Magnetic Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation AblationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Catheter Ablation for Cardiac ArrhythmiasNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Determinants of Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: The Role of Electrode‐Tissue Contact Pressure and Duration of Energy DeliveryJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1991