A criterion-referenced measurement approach to ESL achievement testing
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language Testing
- Vol. 1 (2) , 171-201
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100204
Abstract
The distinction between norm-referenced measurement (NRM) and criterion-referenced measurement (CRM) has become recognized as an issue in second-language testing. Traditional methods used to determine the reliability and validity of a test, as well as to analyse items for test improvement have been based on NRM principles. These traditional methods are not entirely appropriate for criterion-referenced tests designed to measure course achievement. This study presents approaches to test development item analysis, reliability and validity based on CRM principles. These CRM approaches are discussed and compared with NRM approaches in terms of the types of decisions which result from either approach. The study was conducted using data from an ESL achievement testing project currently in progress at UCLA. The results indicate that CRM approaches provide information not available through NRM methods.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN INTRODUCTION TO GENERALIZABILITY THEORY IN SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH1Language Learning, 1982
- Improving the Psychometric, Criterion-Referenced, and Practical Qualities of Integrative Language TestsTESOL Quarterly, 1982
- Generalizability theory: 1973–1980British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1981
- Criterion-Referenced Testing and Measurement: A Review of Technical Issues and DevelopmentsReview of Educational Research, 1978
- EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SAMPLES ON ITEM AND TEST CHARACTERISTICS OF CRITERION‐REFERENCED TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1974
- CRITERION‐REFERENCED TESTING: COMMENTS ON RELIABILITY1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972
- CRITERION‐REFERENCED APPLICATIONS OF CLASSICAL TEST THEORY 1,2Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972
- IMPLICATIONS OF CRITERION‐REFERENCED MEASUREMENT1,2Journal of Educational Measurement, 1969
- Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions.American Psychologist, 1963