Comparative analysis of discrete exosome fractions obtained by differential centrifugation
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
- Vol. 3 (1) , 25011
- https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.25011
Abstract
Background: Cells release a mixture of extracellular vesicles, amongst these exosomes, that differ in size, density and composition. The standard isolation method for exosomes is centrifugation of fluid samples, typically at 100,000×g or above. Knowledge of the effect of discrete ultracentrifugation speeds on the purification from different cell types, however, is limited.Methods: We examined the effect of applying differential centrifugation g‐forces ranging from 33,000×g to 200,000×g on exosome yield and purity, using 2 unrelated human cell lines, embryonic kidney HEK293 cells and bladder carcinoma FL3 cells. The fractions were evaluated by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), total protein quantification and immunoblotting for CD81, TSG101, syntenin, VDAC1 and calreticulin.Results: NTA revealed the lowest background particle count in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium media devoid of phenol red and cleared by 200,000×g overnight centrifugation. The centrifugation tube fill level impacted the sedimentation efficacy. Comparative analysis by NTA, protein quantification, and detection of exosomal and contamination markers identified differences in vesicle size, concentration and composition of the obtained fractions. In addition, HEK293 and FL3 vesicles displayed marked differences in sedimentation characteristics. Exosomes were pelleted already at 33,000×g, a g‐force which also removed most contaminating microsomes. Optimal vesicle‐to‐protein yield was obtained at 67,000×g for HEK293 cells but 100,000×g for FL3 cells. Relative expression of exosomal markers (TSG101, CD81, syntenin) suggested presence of exosome subpopulations with variable sedimentation characteristics.Conclusions: Specific g‐force/k factor usage during differential centrifugation greatly influences the purity and yield of exosomes. The vesicle sedimentation profile differed between the 2 cell lines.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- How pure are your vesicles?Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, 2013
- Extracellular vesicle sizing and enumeration by nanoparticle tracking analysisJournal of Extracellular Vesicles, 2013
- Exosomes Released from Mycoplasma Infected Tumor Cells Activate Inhibitory B CellsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Body fluid derived exosomes as a novel template for clinical diagnosticsJournal of Translational Medicine, 2011
- Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using Nanoparticle Tracking AnalysisPublished by Elsevier ,2011
- Detection and isolation of cell-derived microparticles are compromised by protein complexes resulting from shared biophysical parametersBlood, 2011
- Maximum yields of microsomal-type membranes from small amounts of plant material without requiring ultracentrifugationAnalytical Biochemistry, 2010
- Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responsesNature Reviews Immunology, 2009
- Exosomes Packaging APOBEC3G Confer Human Immunodeficiency Virus Resistance to Recipient CellsJournal of Virology, 2009
- Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkersNature Cell Biology, 2008