Access to multidisciplinary cancer care
Open Access
- 3 February 2004
- Vol. 100 (4) , 701-709
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20030
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) with radiation (BCSR) requires a multidisciplinary care approach between surgeons and radiation oncologists.METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined the use of preoperative radiation oncology consultation and whether use of or distance to this care was associated with treatment choice among 1188 women age ≥ 65 years who were diagnosed with local or regional breast carcinoma in Washington State in 1994 and 1995. Study outcomes included rates of BCSR; BCS alone; and mastectomy; and radiation therapy among women who underwent BCS.RESULTS: Only 29% of patients in the current study consulted with a radiation oncologist preoperatively, and less than half of the patients (46.6%) consulted with either a medical oncologist or a radiation oncologist. Among women who underwent either BCSR or mastectomy, the odds of undergoing BCSR among women who had a preoperative radiation oncology consultation were 6.7 times the odds of women who did not have the consultation (P ≤ 0.001). Similarly, the odds of receiving radiation therapy among women who underwent BCS and had a preoperative radiation oncology consultation were 5 times the odds of women who did not have the consultation (P < 0.001). The 3.4% of women who lived > 50 miles from the radiation therapy center had the lowest BCSR rate (15.8%) and had the lowest radiation therapy rate among women who underwent BCS (54.5%), although these findings were not statistically significant in adjusted analyses.CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative visit with a radiation oncologist was associated strongly with BCSR use. More should be done to evaluate the role of multidisciplinary consultation in the decision to use BCSR. Cancer 2004;100:701–9. © 2004 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Rural Health Research: Rural and Urban Physicians: Does the Content of Their Medicare Practices Differ?The Journal of Rural Health, 1999
- Factors Associated With Surgical and Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer in Older WomenJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Geographic Variation in the Treatment of Localized Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Development and Application of a Population-Oriented Measure of Ambulatory Care Case-MixMedical Care, 1991
- Eight-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy and Lumpectomy with or without Irradiation in the Treatment of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: Long-term resultsEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1986
- Five-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy and Segmental Mastectomy with or without Radiation in the Treatment of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Comparing Radical Mastectomy with Quadrantectomy, Axillary Dissection, and Radiotherapy in Patients with Small Cancers of the BreastNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981