Protection afforded citrus pesticide applicators by coveralls
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
- Vol. 19 (5) , 635-639
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01183977
Abstract
Four airblast applicators of the pesticides dicofol and ethion to Florida citrus were monitored for pesticide exposure with pads placed inside and outside two types of protective coveralls. Hand exposure was not assessed. Pesticide accumulated uniformly over the coveralls' outer surface at a mean rate of 55 ±6 mg/hr. The penetration of ethion through a reusable treated twill suit was 8 ±2% and through a disposable synthetic suit was 6 ±4%; corresponding values for dicofol were 4 ±1% and 1 ±0%, respectively. While these four penetration values could not be separated statistically at pprobable (p<0.20) that ethion was the better penetrator, and the disposable synthetic suit the better protector against dicofol.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pesticide exposure to a greenhouse drencherBulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1989
- Pesticide exposure to greenhouse handgunnersArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1989
- Applicator exposure to fluvalinate, chlorpyrifos, captan, and chlorothalonil in Florida ornamentalsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1989
- Pesticide exposure to greenhouse foggersChemosphere, 1988
- Occupational exposure to fosetyl-Al fungicide during spraying of ornamentals in greenhousesArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1987
- Dicofol exposure to Florida citrus applicators: Effects of protective clothingArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1986
- Worker exposure to ethion in florida citrusArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1981
- Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight.1970
- Measurement of the exposure of workers to pesticides.1962