In vitro comparison of the Groningen high resistance, Groningen low resistance and Provox speaking valves
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
- Vol. 108 (4) , 321-324
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100126659
Abstract
This paper compares the physical parameters of the newer Groningen low resistance and Provox indwelling laryngectomy prostheses with the established and original Groningen device.In vitro pressure/flow profiles were determined, using specially designed apparatus, in 44 standard Groningen high resistance (GHR), 37 Groningen low resistance (GLR) and 19 Provox tracheo-oesophageal prostheses prior to insertion. GHR valves had significantly higher forward opening pressures than both the newer valves and the GHR was significantly higher than the Provox (pp<0.0001: Mann-Whitney U-test). This may be of relevance with respect to patient acceptability, voice quality and effective duration of valve action.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Groningen valve voice prosthesis in Sheffield: a 4-year reviewThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1992
- Characteristics of Groningen tracheo-oesophageal speaking valves prior to insertion and after removal for failureThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1992
- Aerodynamic Properties of the Low-Resistance Groningen ButtonJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1991
- Surgical and prosthesis-related complications using the Groningen button voice prosthesisClinical Otolaryngology, 1990
- A new low‐resistance, self‐retaining prosthesis (Provox™) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomyThe Laryngoscope, 1990
- Aerodynamic Properties of Buttons and Button-Assisted Oesophageal SpeechPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- A new prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomyEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 1982