Undergoing prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: presentation of choice and information in Europe and Asia
Open Access
- 21 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 15 (5) , 563-569
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201790
Abstract
To date, studies assessing whether the information given to people about screening tests facilitates informed choices have focussed mainly on the UK, US and Australia. The extent to which written information given in other countries facilitates informed choices is not known. The aim of this study is to describe the presentation of choice and information about Down's syndrome in written information about prenatal screening given to pregnant women in five European and two Asian countries. Leaflets were obtained from clinicians in UK, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Czech Republic, China and India. Two analyses were conducted. First, all relevant text relating to the choice about undergoing screening was extracted and described. Second, each separate piece of information or statement about the condition being screened for was extracted and then coded as either positive, negative or neutral. Only Down's syndrome was included in the analysis since there was relatively little information about other conditions. There was a strong emphasis on choice and the need for discussion about prenatal screening tests in the leaflets from the UK and Netherlands. The leaflet from the UK gave most information about Down's syndrome and the smallest proportion of negative information. By contrast, the Chinese leaflet did not mention choice and gave the most negative information about Down's syndrome. Leaflets from the other countries were more variable. This variation may reflect cultural differences in attitudes to informed choice or a failure to facilitate informed choice in practice. More detailed studies are needed to explore this further.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Newborn screening information supports public health more than informed choiceHealth Education Journal, 2005
- Health professionals' reports of information given to parents following the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome anomalies and outcomes of pregnancies: a pilot studyPrenatal Diagnosis, 2003
- Rationalization of Gene Regulation by a Eukaryotic Transcription Factor: Calculation of Regulatory Region Occupancy from Predicted Binding AffinitiesJournal of Molecular Biology, 2002
- What constitutes ‘balanced information in the practitioners’ portrayals of Down's syndrome?Midwifery, 2002
- Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?BMJ, 2002
- Descriptive information about Down syndrome: a content analysis of serum screening leafletsPrenatal Diagnosis, 2001
- Quality of written information used in Down syndrome screeningPrenatal Diagnosis, 2001
- Mixed Messages: Presentation of Information in Cystic Fibrosis–Screening PamphletsAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast CancerJAMA, 1997
- Parental decisions to terminate/continue following abnormal cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis: “What” is still more important than “when”American Journal of Medical Genetics, 1996