Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test: the exercise thallium scintigram
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 84 (4) , 699-710
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(88)90107-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Bayesian analysis versus discriminant function analysis: their relative utility in the diagnosis of coronary disease.Circulation, 1986
- Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiographyThe American Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 imaging in patients presenting for evaluation of chest painJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Exercise radionuclide imaging approaches to coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: Groups, analysis and biasThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Increased lung uptake of thallium-201 during exercise myocardial imaging: Clinical, hemodynamic and angiographic implications in patients with coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Comparison of single-dose and double-dose thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease and prior myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1978
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the clinical clarification of normal, abnormal and equivocal electrocardiographic stress testsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978