In defence of ageism.
Open Access
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 20 (3) , 188-194
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.20.3.188
Abstract
Health care should be preferentially allocated to younger patients. This is just and is seen as just. Age is an objective factor in rationing decisions. The arguments against 'ageism' are answered. The effects of age on current methods of rationing are illustrated, and the practical applications of an age-related criterion are discussed. Ageist policies are in current use and open discussion of them is advocated.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts.BMJ, 1993
- Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience.BMJ, 1993
- Rationing in practice: the case of in vitro fertilisation.BMJ, 1993
- The fortysomething barrier: medicine and age discrimination.BMJ, 1993
- “Futility” as a Criterion in Limiting TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The Problem with FutilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Age and Other Determinants of Survival After In-hospital Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Age as a Criterion for Rationing Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Is Rationing Inevitable?New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Justice and the Economics of Terminal IllnessHastings Center Report, 1988