Validating Quality Indicators
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 21 (3) , 292-309
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9702100302
Abstract
Theory and research have not kept pace with the growing interest in evaluating quality of mental health care, resulting in the use of unvalidated quality indicators. A framework for validating quality indicators is offered by which quality is viewed as the relationship between service structures, processes, and outcomes. Adoption of this framework will facilitate the measurement of quality using valid indicators and should be useful to agencies in their continuous quality improvement efforts. Valid information about the quality of mental health care services will help purchasers and consumers make more informed health care decisions.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- IntroductionEvaluation Review, 1997
- Where is the wisdom...?BMJ, 1991
- Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Measuring the Clinical Appropriateness of the Use of a Procedure Can We Do It?Medical Care, 1988
- Research on quality assurance.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1987
- But What About Quality?Health Affairs, 1986
- A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1986
- Consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- An evaluation of the Aetna pilot peer review project.Psychotherapy, 1982
- Quality of health care for the disadvantagedJournal of Community Health, 1975