Accuracy and Interpretation of Rapid Influenza Tests in Children
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Vol. 119 (1) , e6-e11
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1694
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Influenza rapid antigen detection (rapid tests) can provide timely identification of infection and aid in clinical decision-making. Although the interpretation of test results depends on test characteristics and influenza prevalence, this information is limited in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVE. We sought to assess the times at which rapid tests are most predictive of influenza infection. METHODS. The New Vaccine Surveillance Network enrolled children aged <5 years who were hospitalized with respiratory symptoms or fever from October 2000 through September 2004. Nasal and throat swabs were obtained, and influenza virus was detected by culture and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Provider-ordered rapid influenza tests were compared with the criterion standard (culture and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction) to determine their sensitivity and specificity. The New Vaccine Surveillance Network also enrolled children in outpatient settings during the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 influenza seasons and determined the weekly influenza prevalence among symptomatic children. Trends in weekly predictive values of the rapid tests were estimated over the influenza seasons. RESULTS. Rapid influenza tests had an overall sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 97%. In 2002–2003, the prevalence of influenza in symptomatic outpatient children peaked at 21% and stayed above 10% for ∼4 weeks. In contrast, in 2003–2004, influenza prevalence peaked at 60% and remained above 20% for ∼6 weeks. The positive predictive value of the rapid tests approached 80% when influenza prevalence was ≥15% but decreased to <70% when influenza prevalence was <10%. CONCLUSIONS. Influenza prevalence varies between and within seasons. On the basis of our estimates, rapid tests are of limited use when prevalence is <10%. The appropriate interpretation of rapid influenza tests requires local influenza surveillance and timely communication of this information to the practitioners.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating Influenza Hospitalizations among ChildrenEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2012
- Retrospective Review of Serious Bacterial Infections in Infants Who Are 0 to 36 Months of Age and Have Influenza A InfectionPublished by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,2005
- Evaluation of Three Immunoassay Kits for Rapid Detection of Influenza Virus A and BClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2005
- Epidemiology of Respiratory Infections in Young ChildrenThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2004
- Comparison of the Directigen Flu A+B Membrane Enzyme Immunoassay with Viral Culture for Rapid Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses in Respiratory SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Recommendations for Influenza Immunization of ChildrenPublished by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,2004
- Comparison of the Directigen Flu A+B Test, the QuickVue Influenza Test, and Clinical Case Definition to Viral Culture and Reverse Transcription-PCR for Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza Virus InfectionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1994
- Patterns of Shedding of Myxoviruses and Paramyxoviruses in ChildrenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1981
- Interpandemic Influenza in the Houston Area, 1974–76New England Journal of Medicine, 1978