Some Neglected Problems in IRT
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 60 (4) , 459-487
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294324
Abstract
The paper addresses three neglected questions from IRT. In section 1, the properties of the “measurement” of ability or trait parameters and item difficulty parameters in the Rasch model are discussed. It is shown that the solution to this problem is rather complex and depends both on general assumptions about properties of the item response functions and on assumptions about the available item universe. Section 2 deals with the measurement of individual change or “modifiability” based on a Rasch test. A conditional likelihood approach is presented that yields (a) an ML estimator of modifiability for given item parameters, (b) allows one to test hypotheses about change by means of a Clopper-Pearson confidence interval for the modifiability parameter, or (c) to estimate modifiability jointly with the item parameters. Uniqueness results for all three methods are also presented. In section 3, the Mantel-Haenszel method for detecting DIF is discussed under a novel perspective: What is the most general framework within which the Mantel-Haenszel method correctly detects DIF of a studied item? The answer is that this is a 2PL model where, however, all discrimination parameters are known and the studied item has the same discrimination in both populations. Since these requirements would hardly be satisfied in practical applications, the case of constant discrimination parameters, that is, the Rasch model, is the only realistic framework. A simple Pearson x2 test for DIF of one studied item is proposed as an alternative to the Mantel-Haenszel test; moreover, this test is generalized to the case of two items simultaneously studied for DIF.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Extension of the Rating Scale Model with an Application to the Measurement of ChangePsychometrika, 1991
- A Multidimensional Latent Trait Model for Measuring Learning and ChangePsychometrika, 1991
- Applying the Principles of Specific Objectivity and of Generalizability to the Measurement of ChangePsychometrika, 1987
- A classification of all order-preserving homeomorphism groups of the reals that satisfy finite uniquenessJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1987
- Estimating Latent Correlations between Repeated TestingsPsychometrika, 1985
- Logistic Latent Trait Models with Linear ConstraintsPsychometrika, 1983
- On the scales of measurementJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1981
- A Goodness of Fit Test for the Rasch ModelPsychometrika, 1973
- A measurement model for the effect of mass-mediaActa Psychologica, 1972
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970