The Enhancing Secondary Prevention in Coronary Artery Disease trial
- 23 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 181 (12) , 897-904
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090917
Abstract
Background: Proven efficacious therapies are sometimes underused in patients with chronic cardiac conditions, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. We evaluated whether evidence summaries, which were either unsigned or signed by local opinion leaders, improved the quality of secondary prevention care delivered by primary care physicians of patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: We performed a randomized trial, clustered at the level of the primary care physician, with 3 study arms: control, unsigned statements or opinion leader statements. The statements were faxed to primary care physicians of adults with coronary artery disease at the time of elective cardiac catheterization. The primary outcome was improvement in statin management (initiation or dose increase) 6 months after catheterization. Results: We enrolled 480 adults from 252 practices. Although statin use was high at baseline (n = 316 [66%]), most patients were taking a low dose (mean 32% of the guideline-recommended dose), and their low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were elevated (mean 3.09 mmol/L). Six months after catheterization, statin management had improved in 79 of 157 patients (50%) in the control arm, 85 of 158 (54%) patients in the unsigned statement group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.71–1.94, p = 0.52) and 99 of 165 (60%) patients in the opinion leader statement group (adjusted OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.94–2.42, p = 0.09). The mean fasting LDL cholesterol levels after 6 months were similar in all 3 study arms: 2.35 (standard deviation [SD] 0.86) mmol/L in the control arm compared with 2.24 (SD 0.73) among those in the opinion leader group (p = 0.48) and 2.19 (SD 0.68) in the unsigned statement group (p = 0.32). Interpretation: Faxed evidence reminders for primary care physicians, even when endorsed by local opinion leaders, were insufficient to optimize the quality of care for adults with coronary artery disease. ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT00175240.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Implementing electronic clinical reminders for lipid management in patients with ischemic heart disease in the veterans health administration: QUERI SeriesImplementation Science, 2008
- Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trialCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
- The efficacy and safety of intensive statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trialsCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
- The Tension between Needing to Improve Care and Knowing How to Do ItNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Explaining the Decrease in U.S. Deaths from Coronary Disease, 1980–2000New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Long-Term Adherence to Evidence-Based Secondary Prevention Therapies in Coronary Artery DiseaseCirculation, 2006
- Impact of a patient decision aid on care among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a cluster randomized trialCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005
- A Randomized Trial of Electronic Clinical Reminders to Improve Quality of Care for Diabetes and Coronary Artery DiseaseJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2005
- Improving Preventive Care by Prompting PhysiciansArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000