Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Researcher
- Vol. 33 (7) , 14-26
- https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x033007014
Abstract
The purposes of this article are to position mixed methods research (mixed research is a synonym) as the natural complement to traditional qualitative and quantitative research, to present pragmatism as offering an attractive philosophical partner for mixed methods research, and to provide a framework for designing and conducting mixed methods research. In doing this, we briefly review the paradigm “wars” and incompatibility thesis, we show some commonalities between quantitative and qualitative research, we explain the tenets of pragmatism, we explain the fundamental principle of mixed research and how to apply it, we provide specific sets of designs for the two major types of mixed methods research (mixed-model designs and mixed-method designs), and, finally, we explain mixed methods research as following (recursively) an eight-step process. A key feature of mixed methods research is its methodological pluralism or eclecticism, which frequently results in superior research (compared to monomethod research). Mixed methods research will be successful as more investigators study and help advance its concepts and as they regularly practice it.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causal and Functional ExplanationsTheory & Psychology, 2003
- Can Lessons of History and Logical Analysis Ensure Progress in Psychological Science?Theory & Psychology, 2003
- The nature of inquiryAdvances in Nursing Science, 1993
- Qualitative Analysis as a Public Event: The Documentation of Category Development ProceduresAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1992
- Getting over the Quantitative-Qualitative DebateAmerican Journal of Education, 1992
- Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation DesignsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989
- Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die HardEducational Researcher, 1988
- The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology?British Journal of Sociology, 1984
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959
- Reconstruction in philosophy.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1920