De facto departures from insanity instructions: Toward the remaking of common law.
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 14 (2) , 105-122
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01062967
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984: Much ado about nothingBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1989
- How jurors construe "insanity."Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Jury nullification: The impact of judicial instructions, arguments, and challenges on jury decision making.Law and Human Behavior, 1988
- Juror decision making: The importance of evidence.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- Implicit theories of criminal responsibility: Decision making and the insanity defense.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- AN ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD THE INSANITY DEFENSE*Criminology, 1986
- The effect of jury nullification instruction on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- Patterns of Death: An Analysis of Racial Disparities in Capital Sentencing and Homicide VictimizationStanford Law Review, 1984
- Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- John Hinckley, Jr. and the Insanity Defense: The Public's VerdictPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1983