Impact of the National Practitioner Data Bank on Resolution of Malpractice Claims
Open Access
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
- Vol. 40 (3) , 283-294
- https://doi.org/10.5034/inquiryjrnl_40.3.283
Abstract
Policymakers and commentators are concerned that the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) has influenced malpractice litigation dynamics. This study examines whether the introduction of the NPDB changed the outcomes, process, and equity of malpractice litigation. Using pre- and post-NPDB analyses, we examine rates of unpaid claims, trials, resolution time, physician defense costs, and payments on claims with a low/high probability of negligence. We find that physicians and their insurers have been less likely to settle claims since introduction of the NPDB, especially for payments less than $50,000. Because this disruption appears to have decreased the proportion of questionable claims receiving compensation, the NPDB actually may have increased overall tort system specificity.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating a Bargaining Model with Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Medical Malpractice DisputesJournal of Political Economy, 2000
- Explaining Deviations from the Fifty-Percent Rule: A Multimodal Approach to the Selection of Cases for LitigationThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1996
- The Selection Hypothesis and the Relationship between Trial and Plaintiff VictoryJournal of Political Economy, 1995
- Does Physician Performance Explain Interspecialty Differences in Malpractice Claim Rates?Medical Care, 1994
- The national practitioner data bankJournal of Legal Medicine, 1992
- The Duty to SettleVirginia Law Review, 1990
- The Rational Litigant: Settlement Amounts and Verdict Rates in JapanThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1989
- Reexamining the Selection Hypothesis: Learning from Wittman's MistakesThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1985
- Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic BehaviorThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1982
- Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of DivorceThe Yale Law Journal, 1979