Prognostic factors influencing morbidity and mortality in esophageal carcinoma
Open Access
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Revista Do Hospital Das Clinicas
- Vol. 57 (5) , 201-204
- https://doi.org/10.1590/s0041-87812002000500002
Abstract
PURPOSE: In 1980, operative mortality for esophageal resection was 29%. Over the last 15 years, technical and critical care improvements contributed to the reduction of postoperative mortality rate to 8%. The aim of this study is to analyze retrospectively the role of different factors (surgical procedure, stage of the disease, and anesthetic risk) on the postoperative mortality of 63 patients that underwent esophagectomy with gastric interposition for cancer. METHODS: Seventy-two patients underwent esophagectomy. The stomach was the esophageal substitute in 63 cases. Surgical procedures included transthoracic esophagectomy in 49 patients and transhiatal esophagectomy in 14 cases. Among the 49 transthoracic esophagectomy patients, there were 18 patients with a high anesthetic risk (ASA III). Among the patients that underwent transhiatal esophagectomy, there were 10 patients with a high anesthetic risk (ASA III). RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was 14% (2/14) in transhiatal esophagectomy group and 22% (11/49) in transthoracic esophagectomy group (P = ns). The postoperative mortality of patients with a high anesthetic risk (ASA III) was 47% (8/17) after transthoracic esophagectomy and 10% (1/10) after transhiatal esophagectomy (P <0.05). DISCUSSION: In our experience, the operative mortality was nearly 18% (16.6% after transhiatal esophagectomy and 20.8% after transthoracic esophagectomy). Among the patients with a high anesthetic risk (ASA III) that underwent surgery, the postoperative mortality was significantly lower after transhiatal esophagectomy (10%) compared to transthoracic esophagectomy (47%) (P <0.05).Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- TRANSHIATAL VERSUS IVOR‐LEWIS OESOPHAGECTOMY: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?Anz Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Operable esophageal cancer: Current results from the WestWorld Journal of Surgery, 1994
- A comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagusThe American Journal of Surgery, 1989
- The Results of Esophagogastrectomy Without Thoracotomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric JunctionAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- Transthoracic versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy: What Difference Does It Make?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1987
- Selection of Operation for Esophageal Cancer Based on StagingAnnals of Surgery, 1986
- A study of the quality and duration of survival following resection, endoscopic intubation and surgical intubation in oesophageal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: I. A critical review of surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Esophageal Reconstruction for Stenosis Due to Diffuse SclerodermaArchives of Surgery, 1973
- The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle thirdBritish Journal of Surgery, 1946