A decision-analytic approach to postexposure rabies prophylaxis.
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 84 (7) , 1144-1148
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.84.7.1144
Abstract
The risks and benefits of postexposure rabies prophylaxis were analyzed from clinical and economic perspectives. A decision-analytic model was constructed by using probability and outcome data from the literature and the state health department. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years. In the base case (overweight adult male), treatment is optimal when the probability of animal rabidity is greater than 1 in 2000. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness in the treatment decision; however, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($140,000/quality-adjusted life year) is sensitive to the rabidity probability. Treatment is optimal from the patient's perspective; however, it may not be cost-effective when the probability of rabidity is low.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knowing for the Sake of KnowingMedical Decision Making, 1990
- GUILLAIN-BARRÉSYNDROME AND HUMAN DIPLOID CELL RABIES VACCINEThe Lancet, 1989
- The politics of immunization in public healthSocial Science & Medicine, 1989
- Neuroparalytic illness and human diploid cell rabies vaccinePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1982
- The Toss-upNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Economic Assessments of Medical Practices and TechnologiesMedical Decision Making, 1981
- Hidden Ethical Issues in Clinical Decision AnalysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Speech and SurvivalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977