DIMINISHING RETURNS? RISK AND THE DUTY TO CARE IN THE SARS EPIDEMIC
- 5 August 2005
- Vol. 19 (4) , 348-361
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00448.x
Abstract
The seriousness of the risk that healthcare workers faced during SARS, and their response of service in the face of this risk, brings to light unrealistic assumptions about duty and risk that informed the debate on duty to care in the early years of HIV/AIDS. Duty to care is not based upon particular virtues of the health professions, but arises from social reflection on what response to an epidemic would be consistent with our values and our needs, recognizing our shared vulnerability to disease and death. Such reflection underwrites a strong duty of care, but one not to be borne solely by the altruism and heroism of individual healthcare workers.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The psychological impact of SARS: a matter of heart and mindCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- Supererogation and altruism: a commentJournal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- Commentary on Glannon and Ross, and McKayJournal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- Supererogation and the profession of medicineJournal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- HIV Infection, Risk Taking, and the Duty to TreatJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1997
- A Dialogue on Compassion and Supererogation in MedicineCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 1995
- Duty to Treat or Right to Refuse?Hastings Center Report, 1991
- Do Physicians Have an Obligation to Treat Patients with AIDS?New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Moral SaintsThe Journal of Philosophy, 1982
- ‘Saints and Heroes’Philosophy, 1982