Multicenter Comparison of Processes of Care Between Stroke Units and Conventional Care Wards in Australia
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 35 (5) , 1035-1040
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000125709.17337.5d
Abstract
Background and Purpose— Approximately 23% of Australian hospitals provide Stroke Units (SUs). Evidence suggests that clinical outcomes are better in SUs than with conventional care. Reasons may include greater adherence to processes of care (PoC). The primary hypothesis was that adherence to selected PoC is greater in SUs than in other acute care models. Methods— Prospective, multicenter, single-blinded design. Models of care investigated: SUs, mobile services, and conventional care. Selected PoC were related to care models and participant outcomes. Data were collected at acute hospitalization (median 9 days) and at medians of 8 and 28 weeks after stroke. Results— 1701 patients were screened from 8 hospitals, 823 were eligible, and 468 participated. Response rate was 96% at final follow-up. Mean age was 73 years (SD 14). Overall PoC adherence rates for individual care models were SU 75%, mobile service 65%, and conventional care 52% (P<0.001). The adjusted odds of participants being alive at discharge if ...Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Evidence‐based care and outcomes of acute stroke managed in hospital specialty unitsThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2003
- Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care?The Lancet, 2001
- Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after strokeBMJ, 1997
- Do stroke units save lives?The Lancet, 1993
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988