Using Longitudinal Data to Estimate Reliability
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 7 (3) , 295-301
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168300700305
Abstract
Werts, Breland, Grandy, and Rock (1980) have analyzed the relationship between a direct and an indi rect measure of writing ability. Werts et al. assumed that the same true score underlies both measures and concluded that the test-retest reliability of the essay tests is biased due to correlated errors. The present analysis of their data shows that the direct and indirect tests measure two different abilities which correlate only .89 with each other and that it is not necessary to include correlated measurement errors for the essay tests. It is argued that the assumption that different tests measure the same ability should always be tested. Werts et al. (1980) did not test this assumption, and their conclusions, as a result, are incorrect.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Longitudinal Data to Estimate Reliability in the Presence of Correlated Measurement ErrorsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
- A COMPARISON OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT ASSESSMENTS OF WRITING SKILLJournal of Educational Measurement, 1979
- The Estimation of Measurement Error in Panel DataAmerican Sociological Review, 1970
- Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest CorrelationAmerican Sociological Review, 1969