Resampling methods to reduce the selection bias in genetic effect estimation in genome-wide scans
Open Access
- 30 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Genomic Data
- Vol. 6 (S1) , 1-S24
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-s1-s24
Abstract
Using the simulated data of Problem 2 for Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 (GAW14), we investigated the ability of three bootstrap-based resampling estimators (a shrinkage, an out-of-sample, and a weighted estimator) to reduce the selection bias for genetic effect estimation in genome-wide linkage scans. For the given marker density in the preliminary genome scans (7 cM for microsatellite and 3 cM for SNP), we found that the two sets of markers produce comparable results in terms of power to detect linkage, localization accuracy, and magnitude of test statistic at the peak location. At the locations detected in the scan, application of the three bootstrap-based estimators substantially reduced the upward selection bias in genetic effect estimation for both true and false positives. The relative effectiveness of the estimators depended on the true genetic effect size and the inherent power to detect it. The shrinkage estimator is recommended when the power to detect the disease locus is low. Otherwise, the weighted estimator is recommended.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduction of selection bias in genomewide studies by resamplingGenetic Epidemiology, 2005
- Large Upward Bias in Estimation of Locus-Specific Effects from Genomewide ScansAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2001
- Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysisNature Genetics, 2000
- Allele-Sharing Models: LOD Scores and Accurate Linkage TestsAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1997
- Improvements on Cross-Validation: The .632+ Bootstrap MethodJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1997
- Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage resultsNature Genetics, 1995
- Estimating the Error Rate of a Prediction Rule: Improvement on Cross-ValidationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983