Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response
- 1 May 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 17 (3) , 337-352
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544873
Abstract
Approaches to text comprehension that focus on propositional, inferential, and elaborative processes have often been considered capable of extension in principle to literary texts, such as stories or poems. However, we argue that literary response is influenced by stylistic features that result in defamiliarization; that defamiliarization evokes feeling which, in turn, elicits personal perspectives and meanings; and that these aspects of literary response are not addressed by current text theories. The main differences between text theories and defamiliarization theory are discussed. We offer a historical perspective on the theory of defamiliarization from Coleridge to the present day and mention some empirical studies that tend to support it.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social psychology, social cognition, and the empirical study of literaturePoetics, 1989
- Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narrativesCognition and Emotion, 1989
- The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review, 1988
- The Relationship of Emotion to Cognition: A Functional Approach to a Semantic ControversyCognition and Emotion, 1987
- Women, Fire, and Dangerous ThingsPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1987
- Emotion and the self: The context of rememberingBritish Journal of Psychology, 1986
- On the role of conventions in understanding literary textsPoetics, 1985
- Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of storiesJournal of Pragmatics, 1982
- American research on response to literature: The empirical studiesPoetics, 1981
- Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review, 1978