Images of savagery in American justifications for war
- 1 November 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 47 (4) , 279-294
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758009376037
Abstract
This paper identifies the essential characteristics of victimage rhetoric in American justifications for war. The Johnson administration's insistence on the aggression‐from‐the‐North thesis is the starting point for the analysis. Close inspection of the administration's efforts reveals that the enemy is portrayed as a savage, i.e., an aggressor, driven by irrational desires for conquest, who is seeking to subjugate others by force of arms. This image of the enemy is intensified by a contrasting image of the United States as a representative of civilization who is rational, tolerant of diversity, and pacific. Further investigation confirms that the contrasts of force vs. freedom, irrationality vs. rationality, and aggression vs. defense permeate the substance and style of the call‐to‐arms throughout American history. They provide the internal dynamic which integrates recurrent form into a genre of rhetorical discourse.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Logical hylomorphism” and Aristotle's koinoi topoiCentral States Speech Journal, 1978
- Foreign policy communication dramas: How mediated rhetoric played in Peoria in campaign '76Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1977
- Kenneth Burke's cluster‐agon method: Its development and an applicationCentral States Speech Journal, 1976
- Images of the enemy in intergroup conflictCentral States Speech Journal, 1975
- Structuralist PoeticsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1975
- Presidential motives for warQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1974
- Rhetoric of MotivesPublished by University of California Press ,1969
- A reconsideration of Aristotle's concept of topicsCentral States Speech Journal, 1965
- Anatomy of CriticismPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1957