Drug Benefit Decisions among Older Adults: A Policy-Capturing Analysis
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 26 (3) , 273-281
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x06288682
Abstract
Purpose . Under the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act, beneficiaries remaining in the traditional fee-for-service plan will face a variety of drug benefit options provided by private stand-alone prescription drug plans. Although these plans likely will differ with regard to a number of important attributes, little is known about older adults’ judgment processes in this context. The objectives of this study were to 1) better understand the manner in which drug insurance attributes are weighted in older adults’ judgments of drug benefit suitability, 2) explore variability in judgment strategies among seniors, and 3) assess seniors’ insight into their judgment policies. Methods . Three focus groups were conducted with 19 older adults to elicit important drug plan attributes. A policy-capturing study with 32 seniors, none of whom had participated in the focus groups, then was employed to quantify the impacts of these attributes on judgments of plan suitability. Results . Focus group participants reported that copayment, monthly premium, deductible, formulary use, and mail-order pharmacy use were important drug insurance attributes. The policy-capturing study showed that deductibles and premiums were weighted most heavily in judgment formation. However, significant variability in judgment policies was apparent, with 3 distinct groups emerging from cluster analysis. The first emphasized deductibles and copayments, the second premiums and deductibles, and the third use of a mail-order pharmacy and deductibles. Study volunteers exhibited insight into the role of some plan attributes in their judgments, but notm others. Conclusions. Cost-sharing provisions appear to be most important in older adults’ evaluations of drug benefit plans. However, significant heterogeneity in attribute preferences also was apparent in this study. Older adults may not be cognizant of the manner in which some plan attributes affect their evaluations, suggesting a role for decision aids in this process.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgmentPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The Role of Representative Design in an Ecological Approach to Cognition.Psychological Bulletin, 2004
- A Review and Analysis of the Policy-Capturing Methodology in Organizational Research: Guidelines for Research and PracticeOrganizational Research Methods, 2002
- Prescription Drug Coverage And Seniors: How Well Are States Closing The Gap?Health Affairs, 2002
- Perspective: Pharmaceutical Benefit Management: An Alternative ApproachHealth Affairs, 2000
- The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of AlternativesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Capturing Policy in Hearing-aid Decisions by AudiologistsMedical Decision Making, 1995
- The Validity of the Inverse Scree Test for Cluster AnalysisEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
- A Monte Carlo evaluation of JAN: A technique for capturing and clustering raters' policiesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1970
- The Use of Simulated Stimuli and the "Jan" Technique to Capture and Cluster the Policies of RatersEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1965